Not much is sexier than a nice clean T/A
I must disagree good sir.
‘67 Impala Sedan/Coup
1970 GSX Stage
This was THREE years of cars (67, 69 and 70) since this time there have been many good cars, and efen fewer great cars. but these cars are awesome. Far more awesome (ok or equally awesome) when compared to the T/A
while i agree with you for the most part, what you have listed is a completely different class of cars.
While i understand your point (and i do agree ALL my cars are muscle cars) your classification of what the T/A was that it was sexy and not many other cars were as sexy as it.
So, the aforementioned classification of “sexy” is the only genre of car that applies to either of our points.
The genre “muscle car” and whatever the T/A falls under are considered subsidiary to the classification sexy. In fact many genres of cars are subsidiaries to the conglomerate “sexy”
So what makes these cars sexy?
Sexy-ness is partially controlled by personal preference. However, there are guidelines for what makes anything sexy. It mostly has to do with preportions and curves pertaining to the golden ratio. So some cars we haven’t mentioned cant be considered for this because (altho some individuals may find something sexy) they do not come close to fitting the massively understood (and genetically programmed) idea of sexy. So Both our examples do fit within both realms of sexy (nature and nurture)
How do my example relate to yours?
My examples show that there are many awesome sexy cars that I, personally, consider sexier than the T/A. I chose them to illustrate a point that there are a plethora of cars that outdo the T/A on a sexy scale of hotness and awesome. the legacy of these cars (individually mind you, not collectively) outdoes that of the T/A
I think I made my point.
P.S. this is not to be read with any agression context. The context is that i am trying to be clear about my point of view with as little misunderstanding as possible.